The Joint Sections explain: "It is good to clarify that in determining what is the area for parking and it is only the concession deed which binds the manufacturer to this destination and is the reference which to anchor any dispute about the nature of communal or private parts of the building."

"Any discrepancy - the Court states - including stacking , ie the statement submitted by the builder/owner to financial offices (UTE in time, Territorial Agency, Inland Revenue) and the building permit must be answered having regard to this ' last, because it designates the size of the building consented and the destination of the goods stamped and approved to be built ."

 
"The construction took place in accordance - conclude the judges - realized the act of consent and the buyer who wants to verify the legitimacy of the good that goes to buy must first make sure that the material correspondence and documentation in enabling decision ."

Attachment

Source: Il Sole 24 Ore   Click to listen highlighted text! Court of Cassation - Joint Sections civilians - Judgment of 13 November 2013 n . 25454 To identify the area for parking, that the concession deed that is binding on the manufacturer. So when there is a mismatch between the piling and the building permit the latter prevails. This was established by the Supreme Court in its judgment 25454/2013. The Joint Sections explain: It is good to clarify that in determining what is the area for parking and it is only the concession deed which binds the manufacturer to this destination and is the reference which to anchor any dispute about the nature of communal or private parts of the building. Any discrepancy - the Court states - including stacking , ie the statement submitted by the builder/owner to financial offices (UTE in time, Territorial Agency, Inland Revenue) and the building permit must be answered having regard to this last, because it designates the size of the building consented and the destination of the goods stamped and approved to be built .  The construction took place in accordance - conclude the judges - realized the act of consent and the buyer who wants to verify the legitimacy of the good that goes to buy must first make sure that the material correspondence and documentation in enabling decision . Attachment   Source: Il Sole 24 Ore