The biological damage , the moral and the dynamic - relational otherwise be described as " existential " prejudices are not ontologically different and all recoverable assets . However, although it is not permissible , in our system, the separate category of " existential damage " , what matters , for compensation purposes , that is , where occurred prejudices arising from injury to the interests of the person with constitutional status , or arising made - from crime , they are already the subject of appreciation and the payment by the trial judge , noting that nothing in the latter liquids them under the heading of non-pecuniary damage them or retract according to the tradition passed under the label " existential damage " .

New rules on child pornography, raising the level of protection of copyright seventy years for musical works, postponement of by-laws and the Bank of Italy and sull'Imu national mourning for the tragic events of Sardinia: these are the conclusions the Council of Ministers today.

Civil Cassation , sez. VI -T , Order No. 20211 03.09.2013

Order of 3 September 2013, n . 20211 , the Court of Cassation back to take care of the grounds of tax bill .

It should be noted that the Ordinance does not include the facts behind the decision giving rise to the folder , such as whether or not descendant from a liquidation pursuant to art. 36 -bis of Presidential Decree no. 600/1973 . In addition, it is not clear what were the grounds on which the Inland Revenue has set its appeal to the Supreme Court .

The figure of the Justice of the Peace has been introduced into our law by Law November 21, 1991 , n . 374 , and currently having a workforce of 4,700 units distributed in 849 locations throughout the country . The Justice of the Peace is an honorary magistrate to which they are temporarily assigned to judicial office.

Court of Appeal - Criminal Section VI - Order of 13 November 2013 n. 25538

On limitation of compensation for damage caused by vehicles, the application of the second part of the third paragraph of Art. 2947 c.c., namely the limitation of five years, and not the longer one provided for in cases where the conduct constitutes an offense, requires that it should not be of any criminal sentence but only to judgments that do not declare the extinction of the offense for prescription andat is, judgments of conviction or acquittal for reasons other than the above-mentioned species. This was established by the Supreme Court in its judgment 25538/2013.