The biological damage , the moral and the dynamic - relational otherwise be described as " existential " prejudices are not ontologically different and all recoverable assets . However, although it is not permissible , in our system, the separate category of " existential damage " , what matters , for compensation purposes , that is , where occurred prejudices arising from injury to the interests of the person with constitutional status , or arising made - from crime , they are already the subject of appreciation and the payment by the trial judge , noting that nothing in the latter liquids them under the heading of non-pecuniary damage them or retract according to the tradition passed under the label " existential damage " .

Court of Cassation - Joint Sections civilians - Judgment of 13 November 2013 n . 25454

To identify the area for parking, that the concession deed that is binding on the manufacturer. So when there is a mismatch between the piling and the building permit the latter prevails. This was established by the Supreme Court in its judgment 25454/2013.